UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Involute splines are critical power transmission components in mechanical drive systems, widely used in aircraft, automobiles, heavy machinery, construction machinery, and other fields due to their excellent mechanical strength and smooth transmission characteristics.
You may have noticed that different manufacturers use different numbers of teeth and modules for splines with the same diameter. For example, for DIN5480 involute splines with a reference diameter of 110mm, some use a module of 2 with 54 teeth, while others use a module of 4 with 26 teeth. Even during your own design, you may face the confusion: should you choose a large module with fewer teeth or a small module with more teeth? Today, we will explore the principles behind this (This kind of professional knowledge is exclusively shared on justway—don’t forget to follow us if you haven’t already! 😄).

We know that design and parameter selection aim to ensure sufficient strength to prevent failure. For properly designed involute splines, the common failure modes ranked by frequency are: tooth surface crushing, fretting wear, shaft torsional deformation or fatigue fracture, tooth pitting, and tooth breakage.
First, let’s look at tooth surface crushing. For the contact strength of spline tooth flanks, the formula for average contact stress (σc) is:

Where:
- D = reference circle diameter;
- h = effective contact height of the tooth;
- L = working length of the spline;
- z = number of teeth;
- ψ = load distribution factor (usually around 0.75).
As we know, the reference circle diameter D = mz (m = module); the effective contact height h of the spline is usually proportional to the module. Substituting z = D/m and h ∝ m into the above formula, we get:

From this, we can see that the tooth surface contact stress is independent of the module m. Although increasing the module thickens individual teeth and enhances their load-bearing capacity, the number of teeth z decreases correspondingly for the same diameter. These two effects almost cancel each other out in ideal derivations.
We won’t delve into fretting wear here—for those interested, refer to our previous article: "Wear or Rust? That’s Fretting Corrosion!" Next, it’s easier to understand that shaft torsional deformation or fatigue fracture (ranked third) is also determined by diameter. We won’t list the formula here, but it’s common knowledge that the torsional strength of a shaft is proportional to the cube of its diameter (D³).
In summary, the strength of involute splines mainly depends on the reference circle diameter (or pitch diameter, the term is interchangeable) and has little to do with the module size (under the same spline length and precision). Many of you may have encountered similar statements in textbooks or technical materials.
If there is no significant difference between a large module with fewer teeth and a small module with more teeth for the same reference diameter, why do different manufacturers and applications have different selections? The main considerations are as follows:
- Spline precision is difficult to guarantee;
- Structural design leads to eccentric loading, misalignment errors, or similar issues.
Under these conditions, the load distribution factor ψ decreases significantly, potentially causing only 2-3 teeth to "bear the entire load." In such cases, the likely failure mode shifts from tooth surface crushing or shaft torsional deformation to tooth breakage.
Assuming the circumferential force on a single tooth is Fi, the formula for the bending stress at the root of a single tooth is (where tooth height h and tooth thickness S are both proportional to the module m):

It can be seen that for the same single-tooth force Fi, a larger module m results in lower bending stress σb. When only a few teeth bear the load, large-module teeth can prevent instantaneous breakage or severe plastic deformation due to their higher single-tooth stiffness and cross-sectional strength.
- Spline machining precision and installation/operation precision are acceptable.
More teeth offer multiple advantages:
- Better centering performance;
- Larger total contact area;
- Larger root circle diameter;
- Reduced stress concentration.

Additionally, a small module with more teeth requires less material removal, making it suitable for compact structures with limited space. For example, for the external spline ring gear shown in the Img above, under size constraints, using a large module would require removing more material—this could result in insufficient material thickness from the tooth root to the outer circle, leading to potential failure.
Here are some classic previous articles related to splines for your further reading. Don’t forget to like and share!